Financial Times Top Financial Advisers

 3rd Year in a Row!

Today’s investment landscape is more complex than it has ever been. increasingly, it takes a team of dedicated experts to effectively manage your money, and more and more people are realizing the value of working with a fee-only investment advisor such as BWFA.

Recently, the Financial Times recognized 300 top RIAs*, based on criteria including: assets under management (AUM), AUM growth rate, years in existence, compliance record, industry certifications (such as CFP® and CFA), and online accessibility.

While it’s gratifying to be recognized, BWFA’s main objective continues to be serving our clients with undivided loyalty. We provide impartial advice and work exceptionally hard at helping our clients achieve their goals. As always, we are dedicated to serving our clients’ best interests.

FT3_2016 smaller
FT_Top400_AdvisorsLogop2013
FT3_PG2
*“RIA,” as used in the Financial Times article, is an abbreviation for Registered Investment Adviser and is not a designation. Registration as an investment adviser does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by securities regulators nor does it indicate that the adviser has attained a particular level of skill or ability.
________________________________________________
FT 300 Disclosure: The Financial Times Top 300 Registered Investment Advisors is an independent listing produced by the Financial Times (June, 2014, 2015, 2016). The FT 300 is based on data gathered from RIA firms, regulatory disclosures, and the FT’s research. As identified by the FT, the listing reflected each practice’s performance in six primary areas, including assets under management, asset growth, compliance record, years in existence, credentials and accessibility. Neither the RIA firms nor their employees pay a fee to The Financial Times in exchange for inclusion in the FT 300. Third-party rankings from Financial Times and other publications are no guarantee of future investment success. Working with a highly ranked adviser does not ensure that a client or prospective client will experience a higher level of performance results. These rankings should not be construed as an endorsement of the adviser by any client.